The God Squad
Home | Links | Biography | The God Squad | Disability | Dystonia | Marijuana as Medicine | Legal Drug Addiction |

Photo: Self Portrait
Newspaper Articles
Personal Stories/Opinions
Newspaper Articles Archive

sitemap    privacy  © 2003

Personal Stories/Opinions

Last Updated:

VERBAL ABUSE AT REDRESS NOT IN 2002 ACT

I notice in the Newspaper Article (Victim protests over redress board hearing) by Liam Reid dated 16/04/2004 that Mr Tom Sweeney says that at his Redress Board hearing, he had to endure 'disparaging remarks' by members of the Redress Board. Having read the Redress Act 2002 I can find nothing which gives this Board the right to make any such remarks to anyone if they are to abide by the Act as follows:-

Functions of Board.

5.-(1) The Board shall-

(a) make awards in accordance with this Act which are fair and reasonable having regard to the unique circumstances of each applicant,
(b) make all reasonable efforts, through public advertisement, direct correspondence with persons who were residents of an institution and otherwise, to ensure that persons who were residents of an institution are made aware of the function, referred to in paragraph (a), of the Board,
(c) have regard to the age and health of an applicant when determining the order in which applications are heard by it, and
(d) ensure, in so far as is practicable, that hearings are conducted as informally as is possible having regard to all the circumstances.
(2) The Board shall have all such powers as are necessary or expedient for the performance of its functions.
(3) When considering an application under this Act the Board- (a) shall not address any issue of fault or negligence arising out of evidence given in an application under this Act, and
(b) shall not make a finding of fact relating to fault or negligence referred to in paragraph (a).
(4) The Board may-
(a) give directions for the purposes of exercising its functions under this Act, and
(b) make provision for the taking of evidence on commission for the purposes of this Act.

I see nothing in the above which shows that the Board has the power to verbally abuse the very people it was set up to help and further, if the Board is in violation of the Act by such abuse, why then are counsel and or solicitors not taking them to task at the time of the remarks and or abuse?

I would encourage people to be on the lookout for unwarranted and potentially abusive remarks when they appear and that each and every one of us instruct our counsel/solicitor to take any action necessary if such abuse is voiced.

Email: Martin John Joseph Petty-O'Callaghan,
Bradford, England
.