The following letter appeared in today version of the Irish Times. The longer version of the letter is included below:

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Madam,

Are the candidates running for office ignoring the Ferns, Ryan, and Murphy Reports and their collective indictment of this nation’s treatment of its children? It is a serious question, asked in light of the scant attention afforded the issue of church-State relations over the course of the campaign.
And, even as the economic agenda dominates the political debate, we ask whether the incoming government will complete the unfinished work of making right the abuses suffered by women and children in residential and other institutions? Simply put, does the financial crisis veto all other social and political concerns for the foreseeable future?
Before heading to the polls on Friday, we think it important to remind the electorate of the June 2009 all-party Dáil motion pledging to “cherish all of the children of the nation equally”. Were we not meant to understand by that motion that the neglect of vulnerable and/or socially marginalised children was a thing of the past? The Murphy report was published in November 2009, and one year later its full import was realised with the publication of excised material detailing the heinous abuses perpetrated by Fr Tony Walsh.
The Cloyne Diocese report will be published later this spring, in the first months of the new government. Will our political leaders have the courage finally to hold the Catholic Church accountable for past abuses, and in doing so prioritise the rights of survivors?
In November 2010, the Irish Human Rights Commission found sufficient evidence of significant human rights violations in the nation’s Magdalene laundries to recommend that the Government institute a statutory inquiry.
The outgoing Government refused to act, referring the assessment document to the Attorney General’s office for review. No action was taken. Again, our political leaders failed the most vulnerable of our citizens. In the final days of this campaign, we ask for whom does the political system work in this country?
Whoever is elected to office on Friday, our political leaders must demonstrate the political will to address the unfinished business of our nation’s past – the business of church-State collusion and complicity in the abuse of tens of thousands of our citizens. – Yours, etc,

JAMES M SMITH, Associate Professor, English Department, Boston College
Mari Steed, Director, Justice for Magdalenes;
CLAIRE McGETTRICK, Adoption Rights Alliance;
PADDY DOYLE, Author, The God Squad,
MAEVE O’ROURKE, Harvard University Law School Global Human Rights Fellow,
C/o Justice for Magdalenes,
Crocknahattina,
Bailieborough,
Co Cavan.
=================================================================
LONG VERSION – Unedited by the Irish Times.

Church abuse should be a serious election concern

With the general election now only days away, we ask whether the candidates running for office are ignoring the Ferns, Ryan, and Murphy Reports and their collective indictment of this nation’s treatment of its children? It is a serious question, asked in light of the scant attention afforded the issue of Church-State relations over the course of the campaign.

And, even as the economic agenda dominates the political debate, we ask whether the incoming government will complete the unfinished work of making right the abuses suffered by women and children in residential and other institutions? Simply put, does the financial crisis veto all other social and political concerns for the foreseeable future?

If you were expecting to find answers to these questions in the party manifestos, you would be wrong. Reading the various programs for government, it is impossible to determine where the political leaders stand on these issues. Social and child welfare is either ignored altogether or appears peripheral to the various plans. The implications for survivors of institutional abuse are deeply troubling.

So, before heading to the polls on Friday, we think it important to remind the electorate of the June 2009 all-party Dáil motion pledging to “cherish all of the children of the nation equally”? Were we not meant to understand by that motion that the neglect of vulnerable and/or socially marginalized children was a thing of the past?

Some of us were sceptical at the time. Within months of the Ryan Report, the outgoing Minister for Children characterized the 2009 Institutional Child Abuse Bill as “premature.” That legislation would have extended the Residential Institutions Redress Scheme to groups previously excluded. It would have removed the “gagging order” from survivors who received a settlement through the RIRB. And, it would have wiped clean all criminal records for adults detained as children in residential institutions. Survivors still wait for their political leaders to deliver these reforms.

The Murphy report was published in November 2009, and one year later its full import was realized with the publication of excised material detailing the heinous abuses perpetrated by Fr. Tony Walsh. We seem to have forgotten Brian Cowen’s defence of the Papal Nuncio’s non-cooperation with the commission of inquiry on terms of diplomatic protocols? We didn’t know then, of course, that the Papal Nuncio instructed Irish Bishops in a 1997 letter that the Vatican had “serious reservations” about a plan for mandatory reporting of clerical sex-abuse cases to the police. The Cloyne Diocese report will be published later this spring, in the first months of the new government. Will our political leaders have the courage finally to hold the Catholic Church accountable for past abuses, and in doing so prioritize the rights of survivors?

Irish society has witnessed the HSE compelled to produce figures for the numbers of children who died in its care over the past ten years—estimated at 200. Likewise, we learned of the 219 infants who died while resident in the Bethany Home, dispatched to an unmarked grave at Dublin’s Mount Jerome Cemetery. Dare we ask that politicians investigate the nature of the state’s involvement in these deaths? And, what of the infants who died in Catholic mother-and-baby homes like Bessboro, Sean Ross Abbey or Castlepollard? Where are those infants buried?

In November 2010, the Irish Human Rights Commission found sufficient evidence of significant human rights violations in the nation’s Magdalene laundries to recommend that the government institute a statutory inquiry. The IHRC Assessment report recognizes the importance of restorative justice for a population of aging and elderly survivors. The outgoing government refused to act, referring the document to the Attorney General’s office for review. No action was taken. Again, our political leaders failed the most vulnerable of our citizens.

It doesn’t stop there. Irish society is still waiting for a constitutional referendum on children’s rights. We are still waiting for adoption legislation that recognizes the right of adoptees to access their birth records. And, we are still waiting for emergency social work coverage for vulnerable children during weekends and holiday periods. Children left un-protected. Will our newly elected government ensure their health and safety?

In the final days of this campaign, we ask for whom does the political system work in this country?

Not for our most vulnerable citizens? Not for those seeking to reclaim their stolen past? Not for those seeking justice for abuses perpetrated on them at the hands of Catholic religious orders and the State. Not for those children of parents victimized by a culture of political deference to the
Catholic Church? Not for adult adoptees seeking to know who they are and where they come from? Not for a population of elderly and aging women desperate to know that what happened to them in a different era was wrong and that they were not at fault?

Whoever is elected to office next Friday, our political leaders must demonstrate the political will to address the unfinished business of our nation’s past—the business of Church-State collusion and complicity in the abuse of tens of thousands of our citizens.

James M. Smith, Associate Professor, English Department, Boston College
Mari Steed, Director, Justice for Magdalenes
Claire McGettrick, Adoption Rights Alliance
Paddy Doyle, Author: The God Squad, Moderator, http://www.paddydoyle.com
Maeve O’Rourke, Harvard University Law School Global Human Rights Fellow

 

4 Responses to “Are Ryan, Murphy and Ferns being ignored?”

  1. robert says:

    NEVER MIND THE GREEN PARTY AND THE SUCH WE NEED A HUMAN RIGHTS PARTY AND NOW, ONE THE GOVERNMENT CANNOT SWALLOW UP BY FORCING IT UNDER THEIR OWN UMBRELLA AS THEY HAVE JUST DONE RECENTLY.
    ((((( IRELAND HAS NO HUMAN RIGHTS TODAY)))))
    WE MUST MAKE A STAND ON THIS BECAUSE IF THE REPORTS ARE TO BE IGNORED THEN THIS IS SO OBVIOUS THAT EVEN A FOOL LIKE ME COULD SEE IT.
    WE NEED TO PROMOTE THIS TRUTH ONCE AND FOR ALL.

  2. robert says:

    IT IS SO OBVIOUS THE REPORTS ARE BEING IGNORED, THE WHOLE ISSUE REGARDING SURVIVORS THEMSELVES ARE BEING IGNORED.

    THIS IS THE BIGGEST SHOCK TO EVER COME OUT OF IRELAND IT MADE A GREAT DEAL OF MONEY FOR THOSE WHO EXPOSED THE NEWS TO THE PUBLIC AROUND THE WORLD.
    BUT SADLY MOST OF THE FINANCES WERE DIVERTED AWAY FROM THE ONES WHO SUFFERED TO FILL THE POCKETS OF THE CORRUPTED GREED OF ALL IN POWER.
    OUR STORY MADE MILLIONS IF NOT BILLIONS FOR THOSE WHO STOLE OUR STORY, ONLY TO FEED THE SAME OLD NEWS OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN SO THE PUBLIC WOULD GET VERY TIRED AND TURN THE PAGE TO READ THE SPORTS PAGE.

    THE GOVERNMENT AND THE RELIGIOUS HOWEVER WERE NEVER EXPOSED IN HOW OR WHAT IS BEING DONE FOR THE CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST SURVIVORS.

    WE CANNOT LAY DOWN AND BE QUIET WE MUST NOT LET THIS LAY DOWN AND FADE AS THEY HOPE.

    SOMEHOW THE WHOLE ISSUE REGARDING THE SUPPORT PROMISED TO SURVIVORS HAS NEVER BEEN IN PLACE, ONLY THE FEW WHO WERE USED AS GROUPS WHO BY THE WAY WERE TOTALLY UNQUALIFIED AS REGARDING THE WELFARE SUCH A MASSIVE SCALE OF ABUSE.
    THIS PROMISED SUPPORT WAS NEVER TO HAPPEN, NO WAY, BECAUSE WEALTH BEFORE HEALTH HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE POLICY OF THOSE IN CHARGE, IT IS WHAT CAUSED THE PROBLEM IN THE FIRST PLACE AND WILL ALWAYS CAUSE IT TO HAPPEN AGAIN AND AGAIN.
    WE MUST MAKE THE STAND AGAINST THOSE WHO ABUSE HUMAN RIGHTS ESPECIALLY WHEN THOSE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN WHO HAVE NO VOICE.

    WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE THEY DO WHAT IS RIGHT BY THE REPORTS.

  3. There is an opportunity here for an incoming Government to establish its integrity and credibility by seeing justice done for the abused and dismantling the church state apparatus that has prevailed.

    Any incoming government will be faced with a highly difficult terrain on which to establish credibility. Careful management of economic challenges are unlikely to bear fruit for a long time. However, dealing with the open wound of past regimes in a very clearly defined travesty for so many, would attract widespread acknowledgement and respect while ensuring that FF does not show its ugly face for a long time to come.

  4. Many of the crimes against children were committed when the Irish Constitution (1937), contained the specific section:

    Article 44.1.2 (struck out Fifth Amendment signed into law on 5 January 1973.)

    The State recognises the special position of the Holy Catholic Apostolic and Roman Church as the guardian of the Faith professed by the great majority of the citizens.

    It is interesting to note that in the construction of the Constitution, De Valera was aided by:

    John M Hearne who attended St. Patrick’s College, Maynooth with the intention of becoming a priest, before opting for the law.

    and the infamous John Charles McQuaid, later Archbishop of Dublin as well as Mícheál Ó Gríobhtha who with assistance drafted approx 6 versions in Irish – The English version being based on a translation of the last version, before presentation to the Dail.

    An aside is that the Constitution was effectively carried by only 38.6 of the Electorate after allowing for spoiled votes.

    The main editors of the Constitution were seconded from the Dept. of Education where I believe today, the Church retains a place on specific committee(s), regardless of their coloured history with children and the disinterest of many who see nothing incorrect with this arrangement.

    MM