Tuesday, September 29, 2009

FINTAN O’TOOLE

I SOMETIMES wonder whether we are so passive about the way the Government behaves because we find some of that behaviour literally incredible.

The levels of hypocrisy or incompetence or injustice are so great that the mind cannot quite accept them as reality. They seep into that part of the brain we reserve for outlandish fictions and tall tales.

Instead of getting up to shake our fists, as we might do if we could accept that the story is true, we look on in open-mouthed wonder. We treat the scandal as a spectacle, and thus behave as spectators.

Take for instance, the ways in which the Government has dealt with the idea of compensation in the last fortnight.

To even begin to compare and contrast the treatment by the Government of women who were incarcerated in Magdalen homes on the one side and of the former director general of Fás, Rody Molloy, on the other, is to enter the territory of crude satiric exaggeration. As a story, it is entirely lacking in credibility, except for the minor detail that it is in fact true.

We know the State played a key role in the maintenance of the extraordinary system of Magdalen institutions in which Irish women were incarcerated and enslaved for the crimes of being in “moral danger”.

Many of the women were sent to the homes by the courts. The women slaved in laundries that were often fulfilling State contracts, for the Army or hospitals. The State also failed completely to protect the civil and human rights of these women.

Read more

Monday, September 28, 2009
PATSY McGARRY Religious Affairs Correspondent

A SEPARATE redress scheme for women detained in Magdalene laundries has been called for by an advocacy group for survivors.

Justice for Magdalenes wrote to Taoiseach Brian Cowen last week demanding that the State introduce legislation for a distinct redress scheme for survivors.

“We contend that the State is morally obliged to apologise for its role in facilitating and silently condoning the abuse of generations of Irish women and children in these institutions,” the group said.

In his letter to the Taoiseach on behalf of the group, Dr Jim Smith, associate professor at the English department and Irish studies programme at Boston College in the US, said he was doing so “to seek further explanation of the State’s rejection of calls for a distinct redress scheme for survivors of the Magdalene
laundries”.

Read more

Sunday, 27 September 2009 19:34

Former residents of Magdalene Laundries and their supporters held a march this afternoon in Carlow town, calling on the Government to compensate them for the abuse they suffered.

The march comes days after Minister for Education Batt O’Keeffe confirmed that women who were resident in the country’s 13 Magdalene Laundries are not eligible for compensation from the Residential Institutions Redress Board.

Only around 200 women who passed through the Magdalene laundries are still alive, living in Ireland and the UK.

Campaigner Christine Buckley attended the march and said the women were not ‘employees’ and many had been sent to the laundries by the courts and other organs of the State.

She said most were children at the time, and they should be compensated in the same way as survivors of institutional abuse have been.

The Magdalene women were excluded from both the Residential Institutions Redress Board and the Ryan report.

Story from RTÉ News:
http://www.rte.ie/news/2009/0927/abuse.html

By Ruth McDonald
BBC Radio 4

It is estimated that 10,000 survivors of abuse in schools and reformatories run by Catholic religious orders in Ireland now live in Great Britain.

Cathy Spillane has been hearing about these institutions all her life.

Her father Joe spent his childhood in a Catholic Church-run school in Kerry. He was beaten regularly by the priests who worked there, and starved of love and affection throughout his childhood.

“It was so beyond comprehension, really,” she said, remembering how her father used to tell them how he was so hungry as a boy he would eat leaves off trees, and pretend they were chocolate.

His stories left a lasting impression on his daughter, who recognised much of what her father had gone through in the pages of the Ryan Report.

Ten years in the making, the Ryan Report was published in May and shocked the world with a detailed catalogue of almost mediaeval horror.

Children – some as young as a few months old – were placed in the care of Catholic priests and nuns in orphanages or so called “industrial schools”.

Many were put there simply because their families were too poor to support them.

The report found evidence of “endemic” child sex abuse and “pervasive, excessive and arbitrary punishment” in the institutions – where children were held until they were 16.

Brothers and sisters were often split up, and by the time they re-entered the outside world, many children had lost contact with any remaining family they had.

Not surprisingly, many left Ireland as soon as they could, and never looked back.

May Henderson was one of those who chose to go. She ended up in London, still in her teens, and, as she admits herself, unsure of what to do in the outside world.

She only learned to use a knife and fork after she left the convent.

“Because in the school, all we ever had was an enamel plate and a spoon,” she said.

“When you come out of there you don’t know anything”.

It’s hard to reconcile this bright-eyed, cheerful lady in her 70s with the frightened young girl who left Ireland all those years ago.

Compassion

“They used to tell me I would end up like my mother ‘on the streets’,” she said of the nuns who brought her up.

She has copies of correspondence from her father to the nuns; heartbreaking letters, asking for news of May and her sisters. She does not know if they were ever answered.

May, like many of the emigrant survivors, has put Ireland behind her.

She has never been back to the land where she was treated so harshly. She has carved out her own life in London, with a family and close friends.

She applied to the Irish government for compensation for her time spent in the institutions, and was successful. But many don’t even make it that far.

Lost Souls of Ireland Lost Souls Of Ireland will be broadcast on Friday 25 September at 1100 BST on BBC Radio 4 or listen for seven days after that at BBC iPlayer

Many simply leave their Irish identity behind, and never look back.

They never read Irish newspapers, stay away from other Irish people and cut themselves off from anything that might remind them of their terrible pasts.

They are, in general, very hard to reach out to. But some do come forward – and often when they do, they ring Phyllis Morgan and Marie Aubertin at the London Irish Survivors Outreach Centre.

Phyllis is a whirlwind of energy and compassion. Like the people she helps, Phyllis too was raised in an institution.

She vividly describes one incident, when a nun dragged her from behind a door and began to beat her, as if it happened yesterday.

Since the Ryan Report was published their phones have been ringing off the hook, with more survivors speaking, often for the first time, of their ordeals.

There is still some way to go, it seems, before all the stories of horror are heard.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/world/europe/8272203.stm

Published: 2009/09/24 07:24:19 GMT

© BBC MMIX

Madam,

I would challenge Batt O’Keeffe’s use of the word “employee” in relation to women who were incarcerated in Magdalen laundries (Home News, September 18th).

During the course of my years of volunteering with the Justice for Magdalenes group I have had the honour of speaking to many Magdalen survivors about their time in the laundries and none of them would describe themselves as “employees”. I have yet to meet a Magdalen survivor who said she was paid for her hard work or who said she entered a laundry on a voluntary basis.

The State’s abdication of responsibility in relation to the Magdalen laundries is nothing less than shameful. Mr O’Keeffe claims that the State was not complicit in referring women to Magdalene laundries. Yet he acknowledges himself in his letter to Tom Kitt that children were transferred from State-run institutions to Magdalen laundries.

Read more

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

PATSY McGARRY, Religious Affairs Correspondent

THE MEDIA has been criticised for being “clearly not objective” in coverage of the Ryan report on child abuse and of being “not at all interested” in the religious congregations’ side of the story.

The criticisms, made and reported by author, commentator and Redemptorist priest, Fr Tony Flannery, appear in his introduction to the book Responding to the Ryan Report (Columba), which he edited.

He writes that, on publication of the Ryan report: “I found myself getting more and more irritated by the majority of the media coverage . . . Too many of the regular media commentators were clearly not objective, but rather had obvious agendas of their own.”

Read more

Wednesday September 23 2009

Minister for Education and Science Batt O’Keeffe officially responded to Tom Kitt’s questions regarding state complicity in remanding women and children to Ireland’s Magdalene Laundries in ‘Minister rules out redress for Magdalene victims’ (Irish Independent, September 19).

Among other atrocious comments, the minister referred to Magdalene survivors as “employees”.

One wonders what Mr O’Keeffe’s definition of an ‘employee’ is.

I am sure that in the 10 years my mother Josephine spent at Sunday’s Well embroidering elaborate tablecloths and other linens sold at exorbitant prices to the tourism crowd (and not a penny received by her), instead of receiving a proper education, that she never considered herself an “employee” of the Good Shepherd Sisters.

Likewise, when she was sent to the mother-baby home at Bessboro, Cork, to have and ultimately relinquish me to adoption, all the while doing more sewing (for profit to the home), she did not consider herself an “employee”.

I have seen the scars that she bears from years spent as something less than a true citizen. The pain left her unable to even speak of her past and family history — including acknowledging a long-lost brother whom I found while searching for her — until recently.

I’ve seen the daily regimen she puts her frail, 77-year-old body through to this day, a relic of her institutional life. My heart breaks each time I read a painstakingly written letter from her, scrawled as a six-year-old child would, barely legible and misspelled, yet clearly heartfelt.

Mr O’Keeffe’s callous denial of state complicity is disrespectful and disingenuous at best. At worst, it is an outright lie and insult to my mother and to me, and to the thousands of women like her who slaved under the eye of the Church and State.

I remain unconvinced that no governing body, inspector or other authority knew what these women were subjected to and I have strong evidence to prove quite the opposite.

Give these women their day in court and let them tell their stories. They are owed redress and justice.

Shame on Mr O’Keeffe and the prevailing attitudes of the Church and State.

Mari Steed
Philadelphia, PA

(Published – Letters Page, Irish Independent.)

Madam,

Minister for Education Batt O’Keeffe’s suggestion that the inmates of the Roman Catholic Magdalen laundries were “employees” is grotesque.

They were slaves to religious and social prejudice.

Patsy McGarry noted in, “No redress for residents of Magdalen laundries” (September 18th), that there is a “dispute” as to whether the “Protestant-run” Bethany House was a “Magdalen Asylum”. Who disputes it? Jim Smith noted in his excellent Ireland’s Magdalen Laundries and the Nation’s Architecture of Containment (2007) that women convicted of birth concealment and infanticide were referred there by the courts during the 1920s. The Irish Times and Irish Independent reported in 1931 that a court sent Mary Elizabeth Walker to Bethany after conviction for obtaining goods by deception. In the 1960s The Irish Times reported the matron as stating that prisoners on remand were kept there.

As a former resident I spoke later to some who attempted to escape from this notional mothers’ and babies’ home.

Read more

Saturday, September 19, 2009

PATSY McGARRY, Religious Affairs Correspondent

MINISTER FOR Education Batt O’Keeffe has been strongly criticised for his description of women committed to Magdalen laundries as “employees” of those institutions, and for his rejection of their eligibility for State compensation.

Head of the Women’s Studies Department at UCD Dr Katherine O’Donnell said yesterday that, where news of spending cuts in sensitive areas is concerned, it was increasingly the case that “Batt O’Keeffe is turning out to be the big thug of this Government it’s a role he seems to relish”.

A spokesman for the Minister said he did not wish to comment on what he described as a personalised attack.

Dr O’Donnell was speaking in advance of a celebration of women who had been in the laundries, as well as psychiatric hospitals, and institutions investigated by the Ryan commission, which takes place at the Student Centre in UCD from 1pm this afternoon.

She pointed out that “an employee voluntarily gives his/her labour; is properly rewarded; and has a right to represesentation /free association with a union.” None of these were available to women in the Magdalen laundries, she said.

Read more

Friday, September 18, 2009

PATSY McGARRY Religious Affairs Correspondent

FORMER RESIDENTS of Magdalen laundries are not eligible for compensation from the Residential Institutions Redress Board, Minister for Education Batt O’Keeffe has said.

“The Magdalen laundries were privately-owned and operated establishments which did not come within the responsibility of the State. The State did not refer individuals to the Magdalen laundries nor was it complicit in referring individuals to them,” he said.

He also pointed out that the laundries were not subject to State regulation or supervision and so had not been listed in the schedule to the Residential Institutions Redress Act, 2002.

Mr O’Keeffe was replying in a letter to Tom Kitt TD, who had made representations to the Minister concerning former residents of the laundries.

He did so on behalf of James Smith, associate professor at the English department and Irish studies programme in Boston College and author of Irelands Magdalen Laundries and the Nation’s Architecture of Containment , (2008, Manchester University Press). In his letter, Mr O’Keeffe made the point that “in terms of establishing a distinct scheme for former employees of the Magdalen laundries, the situation in relation to children who were taken into the laundries privately or who entered the laundries as adults is quite different to persons who were resident in State-run institutions.”

An exception to this, he said,would be children who were transferred from a State-regulated institution to a Magdalen laundry and suffered abuse while resident there.

Read more

Next Page →